I think this question is tough because the negation of answer A does not directly destroy the argument. However, if we think about like this: there is indispensable aspect of residency training ONLY, then there is no chance that we can curtail the time of training; otherwise, the training would no l...

To interpret C: Two factors may contribute to a given accident (X obey +X safety equipment -> Accidents), thus 25+>25 is not necessarily more than half

B is very tempting to me. I think a reason to rule B out is "various areas". It's true that Sweden is in Northern Europe, but it does not necessarily need to be true that Sweden indeed shows cracks. A minor note, B also fails to mention the time that several cracks formed (what if it's aft...

Another reason to eliminate E is, even Z is quicker and less expensive than X, Z can have fewer beneficial changes compared to X.

I was hesitant and eventually picked E. I think I was wrong when thinking "many poets were involved" must include Homer. :<

For A, the accumulation of the typical consumer is not necessarily equal to most consumers. The goal is to weaken the conclusion that if instructions written in a clearer way, most consumers would find it much easier to put the product together. For A, it does not tell us anything about the profile ...

Hello, Confused on this one... it asks what they disagree with each other about. I broke it down into the following: Ariel: -govt subsidies dont benefit art -art role to challenge society values -government expresses society's values -artists cant criticize what they depend on Sasha: -AGREES: art r...

I didn't expect the discussion on this question to be so short...I was most confused by this question in the whole section. Although I later found out I skipped over a very important phrase in the stimulus, I still think (B) is a terrible answer. The thing that I skipped over is "Alarmingly, h...

This is how i understood this question, Hypothesis: studying more increased a student's chances of earning a higher grade. Experiment: the students who spent the most time studying did not earn grades as high as did many students who studied less. Yet, the researchers concluded that the results of ...

I thought the problem with (B) is that "easier for illnesses to be spread " is different from "people more likely to contract the illness". Just because the illness could be spread easily (maybe it's due to the high level of CO2 or other reasons, we don't know) doesn't mean that...

"Inspiring modernist creators of abstract art" somehow means the same thing as "develop modernism"? Would an instructor please explain. :? I would actually say that, as you wrote it, it does sound a little off. However, the answer choice is actually saying that "Cezanne's w...

Well I still don't understand why answer A is wrong. I agree that the principle is "original method→unexpected effect→eventually meets the goal", however, as answer choice A states, instead of the profit, the company's goal is just to increase its market share. And that goal was met by im...