Hello Christine,

I have a question on #23. I choose D because I think #21 illustrates a possibility for K-->L and L--K to work. And I am still confused why one workpiece can be worked by only two employees.

I just have a general question...

What role does "contribute to" play? I always interpret it as "cause", but doesn't "cause" means being sufficient to result in something?

This question puzzles me for a long time. Please, help!

I chose C at first time, but convince myself that D should be the correct answer. Here is my understanding: I agree with Stol1989 that the key to tackle this question lies on the main point of the article - some values are overlooked by those economics when they define prosperity solely as a functio...

I can see now what makes C wrong. "Most common" doesn't equal to "repeatedly". However, I still have a problem with A. My reasoning is like this: 1. legislators discover inadequacy ---> most commonly boost funding A ---> B 2. least efficient g.b. ---> most commonly recei...

(C) Since he didn't think the status of real estate OR car sales BY ITSELF was enough to be pessimistic about the economy, we have no grounds to think that the health of the real estate market BY ITSELF is enough for him to become optimistic about the economy. Thanks, Patrick! One additional puzzle...

I am struggling between B and D when I am doing this.

I eventually eliminate D because I think the whole passage is more focused on Schoenberg, rather than the comparison between he and Beethoven.

So why B is wrong?

In the first passage, the unreasonable consequence appears in lines 24-26: the "harm to self others, and general trust that can come from the practice of lying." In the second, it is lines 41-46: we would have a duty to do everything to everyone. Tricky, to be sure. The best way to get to...

I am least good at doing this type of question...so abstract...

Why not D? I eliminate B because I cannot find the matching role of "a movie studio executive" and "a film's director".

Can some LSAT GEEK help me out?

but E doesnt say originated, and instead it says used longer....I think longer used and originated are different things, even though sometjing is used for a long time, that doesnt mean it is created there isnt it?? "Originate" in this context can mean the longest or earliest a beverage ha...

Im still not sure how C violates theoretical equipoise... and for clinical equipoise they must have different opinions? I think sometimes they can be consensus...can have the same opinions right? but if they do not have different opinions, then does that mean they always violates clinical equipoise...

You're correct --- the right answer doesn't need to contradict. I know what you mean, as I would generally equate "implies / suggests / infer / most likely to agree" as question stems. And an Inference-EXCEPT question stem is definitely saying, "four of these have support / one does ...

"Generally" is still a red-flag word because it's a little strong, but the first sentence doesn't hedge its wording. Using a blender RESULTS in thick velvet not fluffy cream. If that's because you don't have enough air, then you have enough ammunition to support your modified version of (...

now I did not catch this during the exam but still got the correct answer by eliminating the rest. So here is my analysis B - automatically eliminate because its talking about "adequately serving" we don't know how good of a job the universities do in serving the needs. Nowhere is this st...

Here's a general rule of thumb that I use about the the issue of whether something is true. If it reads, John "knows" or "is certain" that ______ is true, then it is true. If it reads, John "believes" or "thinks" that _______ is true, then it may be true, or ...

Here is my understanding of this question. P: training programs lack of actual flying time ---> unrealistic to compensate, which equally means that the commercial crashes won't decrease. ( -A --> -B) C: airline should rethink their training approach. C is wrong because it takes a necessary con...

I think adding specific number to this question is a good way to make some sense. P: body weight - energy must expend to move uphill surface area - energy available to move uphill C: small animals run up fast, while large animals run slow. We know that large animals probably have both larger body we...

Yeah, you're breaking rule 1 again. You must have misinterpreted what it's saying. You will always have a P on one end and an R on the other. If S is in 4, that doesn't seem to tell us much, since it's a floater. I would probably just bust out a possible scenario and see how many answers I can get ...

I choose C even notice that C is stronger than D, because I find in line 37 the author B says "it is a positive-sum game, in which ecosystem can accept more and more species", and I consider it justify "benefit" in C.

This game drives me mad. I am unsatisfied with all the choices in #8 #10 and #11. :oops: In this question, I tried to draw as many possibilities as I could, and when I looked at the choices, I got really confused. B is wrong to me because I draw the following order: PORSVRT (V and T can change posi...