Verbal problems from the *free* official practice tests and
problems from mba.com
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush

by RonPurewal Thu May 15, 2014 9:46 am

Once you've looked at that link, consider the following examples:

My brother and I are alike in our mannerisms.
(Our mannerisms are alike. Nothing else about us is necessarily alike.)

My brother and I are alike in that we both have a quirky sense of humor.
(Our quirky sense of humor is the same. Nothing else about us is necessarily the same.)

In both of these instances, "in xxxx" serves to LIMIT a statement. ("My brother and I are alike" means we're exactly alike"”in every imaginable way"”but "...are alike in X" means that we may or may not be alike in any other way besides X thing.)

In both instances, the green thing is either a noun or something that can act as a noun.
Tadashi
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 126
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 5:02 pm
 

Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush

by Tadashi Fri May 16, 2014 6:39 am

finally...
i understand it now!
haha, so happy. I can sleep well tonight.
thanks Ron. :)
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush

by RonPurewal Sun May 18, 2014 8:12 am

You're welcome.
youyin
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 3:45 pm
 

Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush

by youyin Thu Oct 30, 2014 10:58 pm

Hi Ron,

I immediately eliminated E because I think there should not be a comma before since.

The grammatical book I use gives following two rules:
a. Main idea subordinating conjunction secondary idea
b. Subordinating conjunction secondary idea , main idea

Answer E violates the rule a, however, it is the correct answer. So is rule a wrong?
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush

by RonPurewal Wed Nov 05, 2014 5:30 am

the correct answers are correct.
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush

by RonPurewal Wed Nov 05, 2014 5:30 am

much more importantly, the GMAT exam DOES NOT test the presence/absence/placement of punctuation. so, this is a non-issue in the first place.
tim
Course Students
 
Posts: 5665
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:08 am
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
 

Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush

by tim Sat Nov 08, 2014 5:21 pm

youyin Wrote:The grammatical book I use gives following two rules:
a. Main idea subordinating conjunction secondary idea
b. Subordinating conjunction secondary idea , main idea


Which book are you using? Is it written for the GMAT? You have to be very careful not to use sources that aren't specifically designed with the GMAT in mind, because they can either waste your time on irrelevant issues or in some cases even contradict the rules that the GMAT uses.
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Follow this link for some important tips to get the most out of your forum experience:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/a-few-tips-t31405.html
CrystalSpringston
Students
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2015 3:13 am
 

Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush

by CrystalSpringston Sat Nov 07, 2015 1:29 pm

Hi Ron,
I have a question regarding the usage of since.
In a post in which you elaborated how to use because/due to/in that/for , you mentioned that the word"since" can only be used for expressing timeframe, not introducing a reason. Sorry, I am not able to provide the link . But I remember it very clearly. You said nowadays, many people even news paper wrongly use "since" . In GMAT, since is only allowed to describe timeframe.

So may I have you clarification on this?

Thank you.
tim
Course Students
 
Posts: 5665
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:08 am
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
 

Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush

by tim Sat Nov 07, 2015 9:51 pm

What clarification are you looking for? Are you asking Ron to confirm a rule he mentioned previously?
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Follow this link for some important tips to get the most out of your forum experience:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/a-few-tips-t31405.html
CrystalSpringston
Students
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2015 3:13 am
 

Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush

by CrystalSpringston Sun Nov 08, 2015 3:54 pm

tim Wrote:What clarification are you looking for? Are you asking Ron to confirm a rule he mentioned previously?


I want to know whether "since" can be used to express cause as well we time frame.
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush

by RonPurewal Mon Nov 09, 2015 12:56 am

yes, 'since' can indicate the reason for something.

if you think i've written otherwise, then either /1/ you're remembering something wrongly, or /2/ i typed that while sleeping.
hopefully #1.
(if #2, then please give a link.)
CrystalSpringston
Students
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2015 3:13 am
 

Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush

by CrystalSpringston Mon Nov 09, 2015 1:29 pm

RonPurewal Wrote:yes, 'since' can indicate the reason for something.

if you think i've written otherwise, then either /1/ you're remembering something wrongly, or /2/ i typed that while sleeping.
hopefully #1.
(if #2, then please give a link.)


Hi Ron, I failed to find out the post by you, but got the similiar explanation by Stacey who also mentioned that "since" cannot used for reasons in GMAT.
Pls help with it. Not sure if I understood it incorrectly.

Thank you.

https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/foru ... t3206.html
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush

by RonPurewal Thu Nov 12, 2015 5:27 am

in that thread, stacey acknowledges that 'since = because' is a legitimate usage.

also—and more importantly—you can verify this for yourself, by just doing a little homework.
if you open the 2016 OG and start flipping through sentence correction problems, you'll quickly get to #9, in which 'since' is used in exactly the same way.
so, there's proof.
CrystalSpringston
Students
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2015 3:13 am
 

Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush

by CrystalSpringston Fri Nov 13, 2015 12:40 pm

RonPurewal Wrote:in that thread, stacey acknowledges that 'since = because' is a legitimate usage.

also—and more importantly—you can verify this for yourself, by just doing a little homework.
if you open the 2016 OG and start flipping through sentence correction problems, you'll quickly get to #9, in which 'since' is used in exactly the same way.
so, there's proof.


Thank you. I will update my knowledge accordingly.
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush

by RonPurewal Sat Nov 14, 2015 7:35 am

ok.