RonPurewal Wrote:(b) this sentence doesn't make sense.
if you write analysts said that x and not necessarily that y, then the meaning is ...
... analysts definitely said x
... we're not certain whether analysts said y
that's not the meaning here. the intended meaning is that the analysts actually said all of this stuff: that the increase resulted from xxxxxxxx, but that it doesn't have to mean xxxxxxx.
by contrast, here's a legitimate sentence that could use the above construction:
Laura said that she was angry at me but not that she wanted to leave me
--> Laura said that she was angry. She didn't say that she wanted to leave me (but also didn't say that she would stay, either).
Laura said that she was angry at me but did not want to leave me
--> Laura said two things: (a) she was angry, (b) she nevertheless did not want to leave the relationship.Also is the "it" in B ambiguous? I thought the "it" clearly refers to the increase.
the pronoun is fine.
AbhilashM94 Wrote:Ron,
Is it that ,while can only be used when
1) there is a contrast
2) both events work together
I get 2) but not 1).
Can you explain the usage in the below sentence?
Jane made a left hand turn, while Jane was watching for pedestrians.
Is there a contrast?
AbhilashM94 Wrote:Ron,
Is it that ,while can only be used when
1) there is a contrast
2) both events work together
I get 2) but not 1).
Can you explain the usage in the below sentence?
Jane made a left hand turn, while Jane was watching for pedestrians.
Is there a contrast?
ShriramC110 Wrote:Hi Ron,
Is Resulted a verb here??
Thanks
Although producer prices rose at an unexpectedly steep rate in September, analysts said that the increase resulted mostly from temporary factors and not necessarily foreshadowing that there would be a resurgence of inflation.
A. factors and not necessarily foreshadowing that there would be
B. factors and not necessarily that it foreshadowed
C. factors and did not necessarily foreshadow
D. factors, while not necessarily a foreshadowing of
E. factors, while it did not necessarily foreshadow that there would be
RonPurewal Wrote:aps_asks Wrote:Hi Ron ,
Can u please elaborate on the incorrect choices D ) and E) ??
choice (d) is explained above in copious detail.
in both of these choices, there's also the issue of "while". the two claims work together --
1/ the observed effects are temporary
2/ they don't signal a longer-lasting change (like "a resurgence of inflation")
-- so they should be connected with "and".
you wouldn't want "while" in a situation like this one unless there were actually a contrast. e.g.,
the analysts said that, while the effects appeared to be temporary, they could have longer-lasting consequences
here, there's a contrast -- the effects appeared temporary, but they might *not* be temporary -- so "while" is appropriate.
also, note that the parallelism (or, more accurately, the lack of parallelism) in choice (e) is an issue.
the second parallel element in choice (e) is...
... it did not necessarily foreshadow that
the only thing to which this can be parallel is the other clause, i.e., "analysts said..."
that doesn't make sense; "analysts said" shouldn't be parallel to anything. instead, the parallel structure should indicate that analysts said A and B, where "A" and "B" are the two (parallel) things that they actually said.