Verbal problems from the *free* official practice tests and
problems from mba.com
rschunti
 
 

Archaeologists in Egypt have excavated a 5,000-year-old wood

by rschunti Thu Dec 13, 2007 7:54 pm

Archaeologists in Egypt have excavated a 5,000-year-old wooden hull that is the earliest surviving example of a "built" boat—in other words, a boat constructed out of planks fitted together—and that thus represents a major advance, in terms of boat-building technology, over the dugout logs and reed vessels of more ancient vintage.
A. together—and that thus represents
B. together—and this has represented
C. together, and it represents
D. together that was representing
E. together to represent

This is GMATPREP question. I chose "E" which is wrong. So what is wrong with "E" and which one is correct answer and why.
StaceyKoprince
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 9363
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 9:05 am
Location: Montreal
 

by StaceyKoprince Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:05 pm

FYI - you can always find the right answer yourself by going back through the software - it will show you (though, of course, it won't show you why it's right).

E says that the boat was made of "planks fitted together to represent a major advance" - the meaning is says that the reason the planks were fitted together was to represent a major advance. The technique may be a major advance, but it doesn't make sense to say that the planks were fitted together in order to represent a major advance.

The long dash is used to indicate an example or an aside. Only the example or aside goes inside the dash, so that example either has to go all the way to the end of the sentence or we need to "close" the dash at some point by putting a second one in. In this case, the "in other words" text only applies to the "built boat" concept, so I want to "close" the dash when I'm done talking about it. So eliminate C, D, and E.

Then, between A and B, only A follows parallelism. "Archaeologists have excavated a hull that is X and that represents Y." Only A does that correctly.
Stacey Koprince
Instructor
Director, Content & Curriculum
ManhattanPrep
guest612
 
 

aside

by guest612 Sat Apr 19, 2008 12:13 pm

Hi Stacey,

What's an aside?

I had a problem with this question as well and am pleased to find it has already been posted!
StaceyKoprince
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 9363
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 9:05 am
Location: Montreal
 

by StaceyKoprince Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:12 pm

An aside is just a little bit of extra info that is related to the sentence but is presented outside the core of the sentence. Basically, very similar to an example.
Stacey Koprince
Instructor
Director, Content & Curriculum
ManhattanPrep
Guest
 
 

by Guest Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:16 am

Hi Ron,

In the above sentence is the usage of "That" correct.. I have read your post stating that the usage of pointing words such as this, that, these and those should never be allowed to hang on its own...

Is'nt "the second "That" (and that thus represents) hanging over here ?
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

by RonPurewal Fri Aug 01, 2008 5:31 pm

Anonymous Wrote:Hi Ron,

In the above sentence is the usage of "That" correct.. I have read your post stating that the usage of pointing words such as this, that, these and those should never be allowed to hang on its own...

Is'nt "the second "That" (and that thus represents) hanging over here ?


nope, "that" isn't being used as a standalone noun (pointing word) here.
it's the second half of a parallel construction, in which it's used as a relative pronoun both times.
analogy:
i have a machine that does X and that also does Y.
think about how you would say this out loud: you would de-emphasize "that" in both parts, because it's not being used as a noun. instead, "...that also does Y" works in exactly the same way as does "...that does X".

by contrast, if you spoke a sentence with the illegal usage of this/that/these/those, you'd have to place vocal emphasis on whichever of these words is used. for instance, "i've tried this and that (pointing to different bits of food), but neither is as good as those (pointing somewhere else)." in this case, there would be a distinct emphasis on all three of these "pointing words", which this time really are being used in a way that flouts formal writing conventions.
cesar.rodriguez.blanco
Course Students
 
Posts: 142
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 6:02 pm
 

Re:

by cesar.rodriguez.blanco Fri Aug 21, 2009 9:49 pm

StaceyKoprince Wrote:
The long dash is used to indicate an example or an aside. Only the example or aside goes inside the dash, so that example either has to go all the way to the end of the sentence or we need to "close" the dash at some point by putting a second one in. In this case, the "in other words" text only applies to the "built boat" concept, so I want to "close" the dash when I'm done talking about it. So eliminate C, D, and E.


I do not understand why we can eliminate together C, D and E.
Furthermore, what is the difference between A and C?
Is A better because of the parallelism; "wooden hull that......and that thus....."?
cesar.rodriguez.blanco
Course Students
 
Posts: 142
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 6:02 pm
 

Re:

by cesar.rodriguez.blanco Fri Aug 21, 2009 9:51 pm

StaceyKoprince Wrote:
The long dash is used to indicate an example or an aside. Only the example or aside goes inside the dash, so that example either has to go all the way to the end of the sentence or we need to "close" the dash at some point by putting a second one in. In this case, the "in other words" text only applies to the "built boat" concept, so I want to "close" the dash when I'm done talking about it. So eliminate C, D, and E.


I do not understand why we can eliminate together C, D and E.
Furthermore, what is the difference between A and C?
Is A better because of the parallelism; "wooden hull that......and that thus....."?
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Re:

by RonPurewal Sun Aug 30, 2009 3:34 am

cesar.rodriguez.blanco Wrote:I do not understand why we can eliminate together C, D and E.


stacey explained this in her post above. it's because those choices misuse the long dash,

in that post, stacey described, in fairly complete detail, the usage of the long dash. is there something in her explanation that you don't understand?

Furthermore, what is the difference between A and C?
Is A better because of the parallelism; "wooden hull that......and that thus....."?

yes, (a) is better because it is parallel.
the parallelism in (c) doesn't work, since there's nothing in the former part of the sentence to which "it represents" can be parallel.
CrackTheGmat
Students
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
 

Re: Re:

by CrackTheGmat Sun Oct 02, 2011 7:22 am

Does not 'it' represent to a 5000 year old wooden hull?
Kindly clarify.

RonPurewal Wrote:
cesar.rodriguez.blanco Wrote:
Furthermore, what is the difference between A and C?
Is A better because of the parallelism; "wooden hull that......and that thus....."?

yes, (a) is better because it is parallel.
the parallelism in (c) doesn't work, since there's nothing in the former part of the sentence to which "it represents" can be parallel.
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Re:

by RonPurewal Sun Oct 16, 2011 2:39 am

sumeet.chhabra Wrote:Does not 'it' represent to a 5000 year old wooden hull?
Kindly clarify.


right -- i wasn't talking about the pronoun reference; i was talking about the kind of parallelism (of ideas/concepts/meaning) implied by "and".

when you use "and", the two things connected by it should be separate (although presented in the same kind of context, hence the use of "and").

for instance:
today there was extra traffic on the freeway and i was late to work --> the use of "and" in this sentence actually implies that the traffic was NOT responsible for my being late to work.
(if you wanted to imply that i was late because of the traffic, you could write, among other things, there was extra traffic, so i was late or i was late because there was extra traffic.)

for the same reason, the use of "and" in this sentence creates the inappropriate implication that these two things have nothing to do with one another.
namnam123
Students
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
 

Re: Archaeologists in Egypt have excavated a 5,000-year-old wood

by namnam123 Thu Oct 20, 2011 8:54 am

This test our ability to read long sentences. For me like any non native speakers, this question is not hard after I read fiction books which contain similar long sentences.
namnam123
Students
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
 

Re: Archaeologists in Egypt have excavated a 5,000-year-old wood

by namnam123 Thu Oct 20, 2011 9:01 am

to be able to read long sentences of SC, CR and RC, non native speakers, specially persons who have not taken undergraduate study after getting 100 toefl ibt, need to read a lot, about 1000 -2000 pages of long sentences. This is simple and takes not very long time. half year is enough for success.
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Archaeologists in Egypt have excavated a 5,000-year-old wood

by RonPurewal Tue Nov 01, 2011 7:03 am

namnam123 Wrote:to be able to read long sentences of SC, CR and RC, non native speakers, specially persons who have not taken undergraduate study after getting 100 toefl ibt, need to read a lot, about 1000 -2000 pages of long sentences. This is simple and takes not very long time. half year is enough for success.


i'm glad that someone is acknowledging the necessity for a certain baseline degree of familiarity with the written language.

i'm not sure that the same timeframe will work for everyone, but it is definitely true that you need to be at the intermediate/advanced level in english before you can seriously begin to consider these problems.
samwong
Course Students
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
 

Re: Archaeologists in Egypt have excavated a 5,000-year-old wood

by samwong Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:03 pm

rschunti Wrote:Archaeologists in Egypt have excavated a 5,000-year-old wooden hull that is the earliest surviving example of example of a "built" boat"”in other words, a boat constructed out of planks fitted together"”and that thus represents a major advance, in terms of boat-building technology, over the dugout logs and reed vessels of more ancient vintage.
A. together"”and that thus represents
B. together"”and this has represented
C. together, and it represents
D. together that was representing
E. together to represent

This is GMATPREP question. I chose "E" which is wrong. So what is wrong with "E" and which one is correct answer and why.


"example of example" doesn't look right. Did the original poster made a mistake? Thanks.