I know that we pre-phrase on Flaw questions by thinking about the flaw, Necessary or Sufficient Assumption questions by thinking about the "gap," and perhaps a mix of the two when we are talking about strengthen/weaken (though I find this to be true sometimes and not true other times - I'll talk about this in a second). However, what are the other times I should pre-phrase the answer in my head before going to the answer choices?
I am assuming that there isn't much we can do on inference questions (most strongly supported, could be true, etc.) other than having a really clear understanding of the stimulus.
What about explain the paradox? I feel like these are very unpredictable. Reasoning structure questions? Principle questions? etc.
As for strengthen/weaken, I find that I am really unclear about what I should be doing with these. I read the question type, I read the stimulus, I think about the argument a bit and then I go to the questions. Yet when I "think about the argument," what should I really be doing?