Hi, staring at this question for 10 minutes I still couldn't get the point. I understand that speaker made two claims: first ads of cigarettes are justified to be banned, and second cigarette ads should stay legal. But what is the conflict??? You have to make it illegal to ban it? Also for this type...

By painfully rereading this question again it finally dawned on me that the speaker was trying to say that he thinks the gov should ban cigarettes ads while making this type of ad legal, and the question actually is how gov can manage to do that. But I still think the way the question phrased is str...

Hi I seriously don't get this one. This paragraph mainly says that the sale of virtual goods for real currency is taxable. "the games that are intentionally commodified" is put right after the sentence that made this main point. It's natural to think that the the games are designed to real...

Ok, after a pains-taking rereading, I think due to the "and" between the "sale of virtual items for real money" and the "games intentionally commodified", the latter might need to be different than the former. And I found "intellectual property right" in the f...

Is it because of the intention? So there are two kinds: One is answer B: no intention of the game behind these transaction The other is D: the players get the intellectual property right because the game designers grant the rights to them (seriously, how can game designers do this??????)? If D could...