Q9

 
lhermary
Thanks Received: 10
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 160
Joined: April 09th, 2011
 
 
 

Q9

by lhermary Fri Sep 16, 2011 2:39 pm

I really don't get why D is right here. Wasn't the point of bringing up those two names to show that in the past Euro-American artists have been given credit for work that was done by African Americans?

How does the school have any relevance to the issue?
 
aerialstrong
Thanks Received: 0
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 11
Joined: August 26th, 2012
 
 
 

Re: Q9

by aerialstrong Sun Sep 30, 2012 7:11 pm

Those two names belong to that school. They were thought to be Euro American artist, but when Porter identified them of African ancestry, means that some of this school's works were not done by Euro American but African American.
 
hippo3717
Thanks Received: 1
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 25
Joined: October 12th, 2012
 
 
 

Re: Q9

by hippo3717 Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:40 pm

Is E wrong because of the word "West Africa?" Not just Africa?

Because we don't know whether it was West or East or South Africa that influenced their works?...

if this were to be the case... T.T
User avatar
 
maryadkins
Thanks Received: 641
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 1261
Joined: March 23rd, 2011
 
 
 

Re: Q9

by maryadkins Wed Oct 31, 2012 4:31 pm

yg84028719 Wrote:Those two names belong to that school. They were thought to be Euro American artist, but when Porter identified them of African ancestry, means that some of this school's works were not done by Euro American but African American.


Yes. Is this clear now?

hippo3717 Wrote:Is E wrong because of the word "West Africa?" Not just Africa?


Well, no. If it said that some of their works were influenced by African artifacts, it wouldn't be right either. Their ancestry--which is African-American--doesn't "provide conclusive evidence" that they were influenced by African artifacts. In fact, that part of the passage doesn't talk about influence at all. It just says there were these two members of a certain school, and they were African-American. All we can conclude from this is (D). (And by the way, West Africa is mentioned in line 12, so it does come up in the passage, specifically. It's just not relevant here.)
 
nflamel69
Thanks Received: 16
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 162
Joined: February 07th, 2011
 
 
 

Re: Q9

by nflamel69 Mon Jan 07, 2013 11:16 pm

Maybe I'm being too picky, but just because their ancestry were from african, I don't think that necessarily establish that they are african americans. I mean, after so many generations, I don't think that title still applies. If their ancestors were from africa say 20 generations ago, but the rest of them are in america, does it still count?
 
Olivia James
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 6
Joined: April 22nd, 2015
 
 
 

Re: Q9

by Olivia James Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:07 pm

Hello -

At first my thoughts were very similar to yours, however when I referred back to the passage I realized the following:

L 12-15 "Porter then .... established .... the cultural territory inherited by later African American artists."
The next paragraph starts off with "An example of this aspect..."

Hence, Porter's findings in regard to Johnson and Ducanson are brought down in the passage as an example of his research which focused on "the cultural territory inherited by later AA" -> Proving that D and J were AA.

Good Luck -

The citations used are from LSAC'S PT 26.