by ohthatpatrick Mon Jul 29, 2019 2:06 pm
You might have limited yourself too much during the setup phase. Try proving (E) wrong with a counterexample. Forget about your diagrams and just write a scenario in which G is before V.
I think you may have gone wrong during the setup stage, because you'd need FOUR frames, not TWO, given that rule 2 and rule 3 are each offering us two choices.
Rule 2:
G is before J and L, or G is after J and L
Rule 3:
V is before G and P, or V is after G and P
If you think of those as
Rule 2: choice A or B
Rule 3: choice Y or Z
then you'd need four frames:
A Y
A Z
B Y
B Z
That's too obnoxious for us to find useful, so most people would frame nothing or just frame rule 2 or rule 3, but not both (leaving the other rule kinda hanging out beneath each frame).
Okay, how's that counterexample for (E) coming?
If L is 6th
_ _ _ _ _ L
we know we're doing G is before J and L, so G - J.
And we have P - M from rule 1.
I'm just gonna throw them in for a sec.
P M G J _ L
Who's left? V.
V is before G and P, or after G and P. Okay, let's put him after!
P M G J V L
Read through the rules and verify that we've obeyed all of them, then eliminate (E).