by BarryM800 Sun Apr 04, 2021 3:09 am
I eliminated (A) because it mentions "a set of considerations." The plural form of "considerations" indicates multiple considerations, but S2 only offered one consideration to rebut S1. Also, "prescribed treatment" is ambiguous. If you interpret it as the result of specialists' advice, then the stimulus is about such prescribed treatment v. the lack thereof otherwise, as opposed to benefit v. harm, as described in (A). Lastly, S2's point is not about benefit v. harm of a prescribed treatment, but benefit one of thing v. harm of another thing - lack of truly personal attention. Hope this helps.