Q6

[clydemail]

What do they mean by "at least one," and can't one employee only attend two sessions?

[LSAT-Chang]

What do they mean by "at least one," and can't one employee only attend two sessions?

The question is basically asking what could be the maximum number of sessions attended by these capital employees (combined). I was also confused at first by the word "at least one" but if you think about it, "at least one" could also include all 3 capital employees. So basically, the maximum number of sessions attended by "at least one" (i.e. all 3 possible capital employees) is six sessions since like you pointed out, one employee can only attend exactly two sessions Do you get it?

[Jake_Albertane]

Wow I absolutely hated the wording of Q#1. It totally confused me and I couldn't even get on with the game because I thought I didn't have the correct understanding on diagramming the game... Thanks for your help. At least 1 does include 3... lol wow

[the_sork]

The wording of Q6 is just stupid. Instead of making hard question the people at LSAC make the wording of the questions incomprehensible. How creative.

[m_elian]

I totally agree, the wording of this question is stupid. I was confused by "attended" I think it should have been "could be attended" or "can attend"

[ca_teran1]

Can someone please walk me through this step by step and with showing a diagram, I learn by seeing it written out. So if you compare diagram to this question it can really help me comprehend it better. In other words showing through diagram why is it D?
Thanks