Q25

 
alinanny
Thanks Received: 2
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 26
Joined: May 07th, 2011
 
 
 

Q25

by alinanny Mon May 09, 2011 9:11 pm

I have a bit of a problem with this question. Answers C D and E can be eliminated right away but the fact that A is true despite it not being a reason why is unlikely that rhinoviruses are especially virulent.
I came to an agreement with myself that the question was wrong because even if the patient is incapacitated for long enough to reproduce extensively to pass directly to another host, even if a few of the pathogens (please forgive my ignorance but I assume there is more than one tiny virus hanging around) is able to survive long enough for a person to transmited even after getting better. For example by direct contact with an object that someone else uses later then the pathogen can go an invade another host.
Does anyone have a better explanation.
thank you in advance!
User avatar
 
tamwaiman
Thanks Received: 26
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 142
Joined: April 21st, 2010
 
 
trophy
Most Thankful
 

Re: Q25

by tamwaiman Fri May 20, 2011 9:01 am

I think that if the rhinoviruses immobilize their host before the transmission, they would die(L26-28) because their life span is very short (L57-58); it is why (A) is incorrect for me. :geek:
User avatar
 
legalrabbithole
Thanks Received: 10
Jackie Chiles
Jackie Chiles
 
Posts: 29
Joined: July 06th, 2011
 
 
 

Re: Q25

by legalrabbithole Thu Sep 29, 2011 5:46 pm

I was stuck between A and B... in hindsight I can see why A is definitely wrong. Let me see if I can articulate why.

(A) refers to lines 24-30, which describe a "what if" case where the rhinovirus makes the host so sick that they stay home. The author then makes a VERY subtle point by saying that this "what if" case does NOT happen in real life because the rhinovirus would die out if this actually happened.

(A) plays with the wording to make it seem like the "what if" case explains why rhinoviruses are not virulent.

Evidence for (B) is specified in lines 57-58.
 
zainrizvi
Thanks Received: 16
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 171
Joined: July 19th, 2011
 
 
trophy
First Responder
 

Re: Q25

by zainrizvi Wed Oct 19, 2011 12:36 pm

I'm confused about this answer choice.

The question asks WHY aren't they virulent.

Doesn't (A) give a pretty good reason? They immobilize their hosts before they have a chance to reproduce extensively enough to pass onto to their new hosts.

Only reason I eliminated (A) was because it seemed like a distortion of the passage, but now I'm not so sure.
User avatar
 
maryadkins
Thanks Received: 641
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 1261
Joined: March 23rd, 2011
 
This post thanked 1 time.
 
 

Re: Q25

by maryadkins Fri Oct 21, 2011 6:17 pm

The problem isn't that they immobilize before they've had a chance to reproduce enough. The problem is that they reproduce so well that people don't leave the house! People get crazy sick. If people stay home, there's no one for the virus to move to, i.e. the virus doesn't spread. (Lines 24-27.) This is why we want our co-workers who have colds to stay home. That's the phenomenon taking place here.