Q24

 
magnusgan
Thanks Received: 1
Jackie Chiles
Jackie Chiles
 
Posts: 42
Joined: March 25th, 2013
 
 
 

Q24

by magnusgan Mon May 06, 2013 9:21 am

Can someone please explain which explanation was proposed and rejected, and what the alternative offered was?
User avatar
 
ohthatpatrick
Thanks Received: 3808
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 4661
Joined: April 01st, 2011
 
 
 

Re: Q24

by ohthatpatrick Mon May 06, 2013 11:20 pm

Sure thing, the proposed explanation that is rejected (and subsequent alternative explanation) all takes place from 39-49.

Proposed explanation for why US integrated producers are struggling:
Labor-intensive machinery is at fault

Rejection:
But Japanese integrated producers who DON'T use labor-intensive machinery are ALSO struggling (so there must be some other reason)

Alternative explanation:
The fact is that integrated producers have an inherently inefficient process that hasn't gotten with the times.

Let me know if this fails to clarify.
 
magnusgan
Thanks Received: 1
Jackie Chiles
Jackie Chiles
 
Posts: 42
Joined: March 25th, 2013
 
 
 

Re: Q24

by magnusgan Mon May 13, 2013 10:08 am

Oh goodness I read the question as "best describes the organization of the passage."

No wonder I couldn't find a correct answer choice!!! Yes your explanation makes perfect sense now. Thank you!