Q23

User avatar
 
LSAT-Chang
Thanks Received: 38
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 479
Joined: June 03rd, 2011
 
 
trophy
Most Thankful
trophy
First Responder
 

Q23

by LSAT-Chang Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:26 pm

Hmm.. I am having a hard time understanding why (D) is the correct answer. I was down to (D) and (E), and ultimately went with (E) because I thought (D) was discussed in the next paragraph not in the 1st paragraph.. Could someone help me? :oops:
User avatar
 
gilad.bendheim
Thanks Received: 21
Jackie Chiles
Jackie Chiles
 
Posts: 31
Joined: August 20th, 2011
 
 
 

Re: Q23

by gilad.bendheim Fri Sep 23, 2011 10:17 am

The second sentence of the passage says 'although an exact definition of fractals has not been established, fractals commonly exhibit the property of self-similarity' So (E) has to be incorrect because there is no exact definition of fractals, whereas (D) is correct because the concept of self-similarity was introduced in line 2 and then illustrated by the definition of the Koch curve in sentences 10-20.
User avatar
 
LSAT-Chang
Thanks Received: 38
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 479
Joined: June 03rd, 2011
 
 
trophy
Most Thankful
trophy
First Responder
 

Re: Q23

by LSAT-Chang Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:01 pm

Wow, I cannot believe I missed that since I got Q27 right which basically says that fractal geometry has no exact definition. Thank you for pointing that out!
 
KakaJaja
Thanks Received: 1
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 37
Joined: May 17th, 2012
 
 
 

Re: Q23

by KakaJaja Sat Sep 29, 2012 12:39 am

Hey I have a question about B. Does "natural form" necessarily mean something from the natural world? Because I thought lines and shapes can be "natural form"?
 
asafezrati
Thanks Received: 6
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 116
Joined: December 07th, 2014
 
 
 

Re: Q23

by asafezrati Thu Apr 02, 2015 7:11 am

KakaJaja Wrote:Hey I have a question about B. Does "natural form" necessarily mean something from the natural world? Because I thought lines and shapes can be "natural form"?


In the LSAT natural forms generally refer to forms which appear in nature. Yes, theoretically there are lines in nature, but look at what answer choice B says: example of natural form which can be described by FG. The Koch curve uses lines to make a certain shape. The lines themselves are not something which is being described, but a tool to describe something else.

An example of a natural form which can be described by FG is the cloud in line 45, but the Koch curve isn't necessarily the thing which will illustrate this one.