lhermary
Thanks Received: 10
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 160
Joined: April 09th, 2011
 
 
 

Q23 - Mr. Blatt consultants are

by lhermary Mon May 28, 2012 8:31 pm

Can one of the geeks go into more detail as to why C is right?

It doesn't seem to conform that what Ms. Fring is saying although it does seem to go against what Mr. Blatt is saying. Although I got to the answer by POE, it just seems like a light answer.
User avatar
 
ohthatpatrick
Thanks Received: 3805
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 4661
Joined: April 01st, 2011
 
This post thanked 3 times.
 
 

Re: Q23 - Mr. Blatt consultants are

by ohthatpatrick Fri Jun 01, 2012 2:09 pm

I see how it is. I'm just "one of the geeks" to you. :)

I agree that (C) is pretty weird. On a first pass, none of the answers seemed great to me. You did a great job by switching into POE mode and keeping the best of what was left.

I think we were both hoping to support Fring by hearing something that sounded more like an executive who wanted to pass the buck or find a scapegoat.

We didn't get anything like that.

C) works primarily because it works against Blatt's position, not because it works for Fring's. If Blatt were correct, and executives longed for the valuable advice of consultants, then a consulting firm lowering its prices should have resulted in more business. Executives would have been thinking, "omigosh, I can get their expert advice at a more affordable cost? Sweet!"

Since that didn't happen, since the volume of business went down instead, it suggests that executives were actually attracted to the high price (Fring's position) rather than to the high quality service (Blatt's position).

===other answers===

(A) and (B) are just totally neutral. They don't favor either position.

(D) seems to support Blatt, since the consultants would be making money only if their advice paid off.

(E) is too incomplete to judge. Because they were "marginally profitable at first", are we to think the consultant's advice was good or bad? Hard to say, hence hard to determine who, if anyone, this would support.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
 
Mab6q
Thanks Received: 31
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 290
Joined: June 30th, 2013
 
This post thanked 1 time.
 
 

Re: Q23 - Mr. Blatt consultants are

by Mab6q Wed Oct 15, 2014 6:39 pm

I think C very much strengthens Fring's argument. If their volume of business goes down after they lower their fees, it supports his claim that they consultants are simply used as scape goats to be blamed when things go wrong. The consultants would be getting paid less and as such would have less responsibility on their shoulders, and as such are less favorable to clients.
"Just keep swimming"