carly.applebaum
Thanks Received: 0
Jackie Chiles
Jackie Chiles
 
Posts: 29
Joined: April 05th, 2012
 
 
 

Q23 - Chronic back pain

by carly.applebaum Mon May 28, 2012 11:04 am

Is C wrong because it generalizes from a group of 30+ yrs of age and it doesn't talk about chronic back pain. Whereas patients could suffer mild back pain might not suffer "chronic" back pain. And hypothetically the percentage of people under 30 could experience 100% back pain. Also, is "rarely" too vague?
User avatar
 
ohthatpatrick
Thanks Received: 3806
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 4661
Joined: April 01st, 2011
 
This post thanked 2 times.
 
 

Re: Q23 - Chronic back pain

by ohthatpatrick Fri Jun 01, 2012 1:32 pm

You hit on several awesome components of why that answer is wrong.

Indeed, it's generalizing about all patients, when we were only provided info about people over 30.

Indeed, it's talking about mild/fleeting pain, when we were only provided info about whether people did or didn't feel chronic pain.

And the issue with "rarely", to me, is not that it's vague, but that it's very extreme. To justify that something "rarely" happens, you have to know that it is true in less than 50% of cases.

Did the paragraph provide us with info that in less than 50% of cases when a spinal disk first becomes herniated/degenerated do people feel even mild/fleeting pain?

No.

===other answers ====

A) "can be sure" is way too extreme

B) "are sure to be free" is way too extreme

D) predictive powers of doctors is out of scope

E) supported by the final sentence. If people got sufficient exercise (a potentially effective strategy), their abs and spinal muscles would not deteriorate as much, and so chronic pain would not develop from their (unbeknownst to them) herniated/degenerated disk.

Nice work!
 
HughM388
Thanks Received: 2
Elle Woods
Elle Woods
 
Posts: 54
Joined: July 05th, 2020
 
 
 

Re: Q23 - Chronic back pain

by HughM388 Mon Sep 21, 2020 7:05 pm

ohthatpatrick Wrote:You hit on several awesome components of why that answer is wrong.

Indeed, it's generalizing about all patients, when we were only provided info about people over 30.

Indeed, it's talking about mild/fleeting pain, when we were only provided info about whether people did or didn't feel chronic pain.

And the issue with "rarely", to me, is not that it's vague, but that it's very extreme. To justify that something "rarely" happens, you have to know that it is true in less than 50% of cases.

Did the paragraph provide us with info that in less than 50% of cases when a spinal disk first becomes herniated/degenerated do people feel even mild/fleeting pain?

No.

===other answers ====

A) "can be sure" is way too extreme

B) "are sure to be free" is way too extreme

D) predictive powers of doctors is out of scope

E) supported by the final sentence. If people got sufficient exercise (a potentially effective strategy), their abs and spinal muscles would not deteriorate as much, and so chronic pain would not develop from their (unbeknownst to them) herniated/degenerated disk.

Nice work!


It's unfortunate that, for (E) to work, we have to make the fairly reckless assumption that the strategy of exercise alluded to in the stimulus won't exacerbate the disc herniation/degeneration and thereby trigger chronic pain. Seems to me that a lack of exercise could have a powerfully preventive effect on the onset of chronic pain. Hmm…