User avatar
 
bbirdwell
Thanks Received: 864
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 803
Joined: April 16th, 2009
 
 
 

Q20 - James responds to Maria's argument

by bbirdwell Sun Aug 22, 2010 12:25 pm

A No clue how the answers for 17 and 20 are what they are, and I don't know why the better answer for 23 is not E and the better answer for 24 is not A. Please help me out here


For #20, we need to consider both Maria's and James's arguments.

Maria:
Conclusion: Calling any state totalitarian is misleading.
premises: Real world has no entity exercising control over even one aspect of life because systems of control are inefficient and so have only partial control.

James:
Conclusion: (inferred) it is NOT misleading to call a state totalitarian.
premises: the term describes the ambitions of the state rather than the actual degree of control.

So how does he respond? By re-defining the term "totalitarian."

(D) states this clearly.

(A) is incorrect since there is no reference to the relationship between Maria's statements.

(B) is wrong because James doesn't try to explain why totalitarian states are inefficient. Instead, he argues about the significance of that inefficiency.

(C) is silly - James doesn't reject any evidence (instead, he disagrees with what it means) and he does challenge what she infers from it.

(E) is tempting and complex, but James doesn't suggest that Maria's evidence prove that totalitarian states exist; instead he uses different support.
I host free online workshop/Q&A sessions called Zen and the Art of LSAT. You can find upcoming dates here: http://www.manhattanlsat.com/zen-and-the-art.cfm
User avatar
 
tamwaiman
Thanks Received: 26
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 142
Joined: April 21st, 2010
 
 
trophy
Most Thankful
 

Re: Q20 - James responds to Maria's argument

by tamwaiman Wed Oct 12, 2011 10:16 pm

I can understand why (D) is correct and (A)(C)(E) are wrong, but (B) is hard to eliminate.
In Maria's definition, a totalitarian is not actually a totalitarian, however, James offers an alternative explanation: managing to do so is totalitarian.
Please point out my blind spot. Thank you.
User avatar
 
noah
Thanks Received: 1192
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: February 11th, 2009
 
This post thanked 1 time.
 
 

Re: Q20 - ; James responds to Maria's argument...

by noah Fri Oct 14, 2011 7:00 pm

I went up into Brian's explanation and added some discussion of wrong answers. As for your question, here's the slip-up:

tamwaiman Wrote:James offers an alternative explanation: managing to do so is totalitarian.


He offers a different definition, but not an explanation (and definitely not an explanation for why totalitarian regimes are inefficient).

I hope that helps.
 
AndyC64
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 3
Joined: December 12th, 2017
 
 
 

Re: Q20 - James responds to Maria's argument

by AndyC64 Wed Apr 04, 2018 10:20 pm

Hi,

I am not quite convinced that using 'explanation' instead of 'definition' makes a difference between right and wrong answers. By re-defining the meaning of total control --- the ambition of state rather than the actual effectiveness of the control, James refutes Maria's arguments. This is equally acceptable to me.

Is there anything I am missing here?

Thanks,
 
LeonC641
Thanks Received: 0
Jackie Chiles
Jackie Chiles
 
Posts: 33
Joined: May 20th, 2018
 
 
 

Re: Q20 - James responds to Maria's argument

by LeonC641 Sun Nov 22, 2020 9:42 pm

AndyC64 Wrote:Hi,

I am not quite convinced that using 'explanation' instead of 'definition' makes a difference between right and wrong answers. By re-defining the meaning of total control --- the ambition of state rather than the actual effectiveness of the control, James refutes Maria's arguments. This is equally acceptable to me.

Is there anything I am missing here?

Thanks,


I also have the same confusion. An explanation is "a statement or account that makes something clear." (Google’s English dictionary & Oxford Languages) It seems to me that James tries to make an alternative statement to make the definition "totalitarian" clear.

Could anyone share your thoughts about how do you distinguish the meaning between explanation and definition?

Thanks,
Leon