by tommywallach Thu Mar 21, 2013 2:12 am
Hello Khaleesi (Mother of Dragon law),
Yes, I'd say your interpretation is pretty spot on. Just for fun, let's take all the answer choices.
(A) The passage says that the novel received "a mixture of positive and negative reviews." This isn't quite "wide acclaim".
(B) CORRECT. We get both "Their Eyes was not totally ignored by book reviewers" and then "the novel went quietly out of print." These two sentences allow us to get this answer choice.
(C) This is a very tricky answer choice. We know that the novel was reviewed by some members of the Black literary community. However, the term "Afrocentric" is never mentioned in that context (or in that paragraph). The term only comes up in the next paragraph, with "The Afrocentric standards of evaluation were equally important to the rediscovery of Their Eyes..." We know this came later, but we don't know if the term was backdated in such a way that earlier criticism could also be called Afrocentric.
(D) is contradicted by the final paragraph, which tells us that the book couldn't be appreciated until Black literature was allowed to be something more than protest fiction (for example, a description of life for a Black female at a certain time, or an exploration of "the speaking Black voice in writing").
(E) See answer choice (A) for an explanation of why this is wrong.
Hope that helps, and good work, Khaleesi!
-t