Question Type:
Most Strongly Supported
Stimulus Breakdown:
Historians don't find ticket sales or reviews enough to determine what the average movie-goer liked, especially as you go further into the past.
Answer Anticipation:
There doesn't seem to be much here that overlaps or leads to strong inferences, so I'm expecting the answer to be more of a vague restatement of the situation.
Correct answer:
(D)
Answer choice analysis:
(A) While this might be one reason for the reviews to fail to provide insight (they were written before the audience could react), it's not the only explanation, so it's not something we can infer.
(B) Relative/absolute. While we can infer that they're easier to determine (since the audience response in theearly 20th century is noted as being "especially" difficult), that doesn't allow us to infer it's easy.
(C) This answer sounds like the second statement, so I might leave it on the first pass. However, the stimulus doesn't let us rule out that these are a factor; it only lets us say that they're not determinative.
(D) Boom. While I'd normally be a little hesitant to pick an answer that talks about a belief, the stimulus is about what film historians think. We know they find the reviews to lack insight, which aligns with this answer.
(E) The stimulus tells us that the reviews aren't insightful, not that they don't exist.
Takeaway/Pattern:
Don't be afraid of an answer that sounds like a restatement of what was said in the stimulus - it can definitely be inferred!
#officialexplanation