by ManhattanPrepLSAT2 Thu Sep 30, 2010 11:22 am
I can see why you found A tempting -- because Jerome presents an alternative reasoning relative to what Ingrid presented, but (A) actually means something a little bit different --
(A) states that Jerome intentionally misinterprets a claim --
In this case, the claim would be "Rock music has produced no songs as durable as the songs of the 1940's."
We don't have evidence that Jerome misinterpreted this idea or that he did so intentionally --
We just know that he disagrees with the reasoning used (He doesn't define durable as being performed by multiple performers, but rather as having one version of a song endure).
This is essentially what (D) says.
Here's an analogy:
Person A says: "Football players are better than they used to be 40 years ago, because they are now far more athletic."
Then someone responds,
"Well, because football players were less athletic 40 years ago, they had to have more skill and so were better players."
Notice, Person B doesn't misinterpret, but rather disagrees with the reasoning used to judge what is better --
Hope that helps, and please follow up if you have any further questions.