by missbenyamin Sun Oct 05, 2014 2:57 pm
Regarding answer choice "A", I would also add support from lines 45-47 in the passage, which states that "lack of standard orthography made sense in the context of the community's needs" - this provides support for the idea that standardizing languages is "sometimes unnecessary." (If standardizing languages was ALWAYS necessary, I don't think the author would say that a lack of a standard language makes sense, even within a specific, presumably favorable context.)
Also, in terms of the arbitrary choices mentioned in answer choice "A", I believe that answer is referring to the "various phonetic spellings of words" (line 40) - in a standard language, one of these various phonetic spellings would have to be chosen as the default, despite the fact that they all convey the same meaning. The passage provides no support for a reason to choose one spelling over another, and it thus can be inferred that deciding between them would be an arbitrary decision.
Moderators - would you agree or disagree with my analysis?