by rinagoldfield Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:18 pm
Hi S.F.Baron,
(C) offers a rock-solid (diamond-hard?) inference from the information given in the stimulus.
Here’s what we know:
1. The diamonds formed 2.9 billion years ago on Earth.
2. Only UV light could have stimulated the diamonds’ sulfur-33 concentration.
3. If there had been more than a trace amount of oxygen in the Earth’s atmosphere, UV light could not have reached earth to stimulate the sulfur-33 concentration.
We know the diamonds formed. Therefore, the Earth’s atmosphere 2.9 billion years ago must have contained "a trace amount" or less of oxygen. In other words, the atmosphere could have supported a hint of oxygen, but no more.
(C) tells us that little, if any, oxygen was present in the Earth’s atmosphere 2.9 billion years ago. The phrase "little, if any" perfectly matches the phrase "no more than a trace amount." This is a good inference.
(A) , (D), and (E) all talk about diamonds in general, or diamonds formed more recently than 2.9 billion years ago. But we only know about these specific diamonds. These are bad inferences.
(B) is tempting... but UV rays caused chemicals reactions in the diamonds, not the atmosphere.