The official explanation for this question is that since Mario is committed to the idea that to be a genuinely autonomous discipline, a field of study must have a domain of inquiry all of its own, then Mario must agree with (A).
I don't think this would most confuse test-takers, but I definitely spent a lot of time trying to think this through. Can we really say that Mario is committed to the truth of (A) when he simultaneously believes that philosophy is a genuinely autonomous discipline AND thinks it doesn't have a domain of inquiry all of its own?
More generally, if a person simultaneously believes in A and B, which are conflicting beliefs (both cannot simultaneously be true), can he actually be said to be committed to either of them? I don't think I've seen any other Points of Disagreement questions using this 'committed' language where one of the individuals had conflicting beliefs, and so was really thrown off by this.