User avatar
 
LSAT-Chang
Thanks Received: 38
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 479
Joined: June 03rd, 2011
 
 
trophy
Most Thankful
trophy
First Responder
 

Passage Discussion

by LSAT-Chang Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:03 am

What could possibly be the scale for this passage?

I could feel that the last sentence was the author's main point: basically that although the current state of our scholarly knowledge relating to law and the medieval Englishwoman is still fragmentary, the situation is slowly improving.

But what are the actual two sides.. is there one?
User avatar
 
demetri.blaisdell
Thanks Received: 161
LSAT Geek
 
Posts: 198
Joined: January 26th, 2011
 
This post thanked 1 time.
 
 

Re: Passage Discussion

by demetri.blaisdell Fri Sep 09, 2011 5:42 pm

Another tricky passage, changsoyeon. The two of us had better be getting better at these Reading Comp passages by now. I think there is a central debate here we can pull out.

Side 1: Analysis of laws is enough to write legal histories of women.
-Many legal historians
support - it's hard to do this and we're lazy (have you seen those scrolls??) and by the way, we don't want to because we don't care about women (as a distinct topic)

Side 2: Scholars need to study actual court records quantitatively to study women's legal history.
-Author
-emerging consensus
support - we need to know if women were actually able to use the written laws or how they got around them

I think this is a better description than thinking of the passage as simply "this is how the field is progressing." What do you think? Does this work for you? Am I missing anything important? Let me know.

Demetri
User avatar
 
LSAT-Chang
Thanks Received: 38
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 479
Joined: June 03rd, 2011
 
 
trophy
Most Thankful
trophy
First Responder
 

Re: Passage Discussion

by LSAT-Chang Fri Sep 09, 2011 9:18 pm

Hi Demetri, I am definitely not getting my head around RC.. It really is my weakest section but I am really working hard to minimize those mistakes! I think it all arises from my bad first-read of the passage. Looking at your opinion of the scale, and re-reading the passage, I definitely missed out on the central argument. Ugh, it's so hard to ACTIVELY read for some reason. I really need to figure out something before the LSAT which is in 3 weeks :cry:
User avatar
 
demetri.blaisdell
Thanks Received: 161
LSAT Geek
 
Posts: 198
Joined: January 26th, 2011
 
 
 

Re: Passage Discussion

by demetri.blaisdell Sat Sep 17, 2011 6:59 pm

Keep working at it. It takes a little practice, but once you're familiar with the method, the scale will start to jump off the page. If you ever want a quick check of your work, take a look at the synthesis questions for the passage (main point, author's opinion, etc) and see how they line up with your understanding. If you're really struggling, it probably means you missed some key details. If not, you understood the passage well enough to get the "gist questions." At the end of the day, that's what matters. Keep up the good work!
 
bigtree65
Thanks Received: 2
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 38
Joined: September 16th, 2011
 
 
 

Re: Passage Discussion

by bigtree65 Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:14 pm

This may be a stupid question but my rc sucks too so I saw this and I started wondering, what is active reading? is it a way to improve my rc? Lol