Old PTs

[ganbayou]

Hi,

I was wondering how much helpful old PTs are, say before PT29?
I would like to ask about LG and RC too...how are they different from recent PTs?
I heard that old LG are harder, LR are about the same, and RC became harder now. But specifically how?
I would like to hear from instructors/professionals about the tendencies/changes they have between the past and now.
I know people say if you have time you should do all of them, but that does not mean if we don't do all of them we cannot do well on real test right?
I'm afraid I can be burnt out if I do all of them (and not sure whether I have time) and would rather like to focus on recent ones, especially after PT50.
When (which PT) did they start their new tendencies?

Thank you.

[tommywallach]

Hey Ganbayou,

I would encourage you to look through the forums at old posts, as all of these issues have been discussed at one point or another. I would also encourage you to look at our blogs, and to simply to an internet search for these issues one by one. If you've done all that and you have follow-up questions, we'll happily answer some more specific questions on these subjects, but answering your questions here in any serious way could take five or six hours at the least.

-t