Trying to organize yourself? Not sure how to make real gains? Rely on the advice of the many folks who have been there before.
 
YiwenZ706
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 1
Joined: December 29th, 2017
 
 
 

LR--recommended time allocation and should I skip questions

by YiwenZ706 Mon May 21, 2018 8:30 pm

I have been timing myself for 33min a section (including filling the answer sheet) during the practice, but a lot of times can't finish Q25/Q26. For my specific time allocation, I use up to 12min to do the first 10 questions, then 18-19min for 15q, around 26min for 20q. And the thing is that I tend to circle the uncertain questions and hope to go back after finishing the entire section, and when I reach the last five or six questions, I become very anxious especially when I realize that I have a lot of questions circled that I need to check again, resulting in less concentration afterwards :evil:
Any recommendation for better time allocation? And when I encounter the question that is still confusing after I read it twice (or simply cannot get its logic immediately or include a lot of bio-related data/info), do you recommend skipping the question, or reading it one more time to do it anyway and circling the question/ hoping to go back to check?

Thanks a lot!
User avatar
 
ohthatpatrick
Thanks Received: 3804
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 4661
Joined: April 01st, 2011
 
This post thanked 1 time.
 
 

Re: LR--recommended time allocation and should I skip questions

by ohthatpatrick Thu May 24, 2018 7:59 pm

You raise a lot of points that show a good awareness of the tradeoffs / variables. There aren't perfect or standardized answers to these questions, so above all you should feel good about experimenting with different approaches (even better if you try an approach at least 3 times and track the data of how many correct answers, including guesses, you end up with).

Part of this could relate to how good your accuracy is when we remove the timing constraint:
if you do an LR section untimed, seeking 100% accuracy, how many wrong answers would you be averaging?

If you're going to drop 5 questions anyway, then it makes a lot of sense to give yourself permission to bail when the stimulus seems to be particularly awful.

If you're only missing about 2 untimed, then your bigger priority is to get quicker at the easier stuff. You should routinely push yourself to do the 1st 10 Q's in 10 mins. (a lot of 170+ LR scorers try to push themselves to doing the 1st 15 Q's in 15 mins). To be successful in going this quickly, you usually need to do several things:

- Be able to take advantage of question type tendencies (knowing the 2 most common places to hide the Conc on ID the CONC ... knowing to be turned off by strong language in Nec Assum and Inference ... knowing the 'right side of the arrow' shortcuts for Sufficient Assumption and Principle-Support)

- Be able to develop specific prephrases for some (but definitely not all) of these first dozen questions, and then to actively scan for that answer, confirm it, and move on.

- Be able to trust your gut when you see good/bad answers, and not be quite as paranoid or agonizing as we might be in the Q13-20 range.


Circling the answers is a great habit, and you have to just let yourself be cool with the idea that you'll have lots of circles you'll never get to revisit. It's a very useful lie to tell ourselves, "I'll come back to this later". Often, our accuracy isn't significantly affected by those extra looks. We're probably going to confirm or return to our original thinking most of the time, so we're not changing much by not seeing them again. More importantly, the time constraint on this test just doesn't give you enough time to reach that threshold of "I've studied this for as long as I'd like to". We have to live with the fact that it's going to, at certain points, be a test of best-guesses. Don't let that psychologically worry you. Everyone's doing it.


Overall, I think that 14 mins for Q11 through 20 might be light. That stretch includes most of the worst questions in the section, so you might wanna focus on really pouncing on the 1st ten in order to allow yourself more thinkin' time on the heavier stuff.

Good luck!
 
JingL911
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 5
Joined: July 17th, 2019
 
 
 

Re: LR--recommended time allocation and should I skip questions

by JingL911 Sun Aug 04, 2019 11:37 pm

ohthatpatrick Wrote:- Be able to take advantage of question type tendencies (knowing the 2 most common places to hide the Conc on ID the CONC ... knowing to be turned off by strong language in Nec Assum and Inference ... knowing the 'right side of the arrow' shortcuts for Sufficient Assumption and Principle-Support)


Hi Pat!

Could you please illustrate the tendencies you mentioned above in detail? And will greatly appreciate if you could provide relevant simple examples :D Thank you!
User avatar
 
ohthatpatrick
Thanks Received: 3804
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 4661
Joined: April 01st, 2011
 
 
 

Re: LR--recommended time allocation and should I skip questions

by ohthatpatrick Mon Aug 05, 2019 5:15 pm

No, I'm afraid that's too big an ask for this random forum thread. Those are all the things you're collecting on your LR cheat sheets, from the chapters, the Interact lessons, and your time with your instructor.

Go try some ID the Conclusion questions, and you'll see that most of them either put the Conclusion in the first sentence or as part of some "but / yet / however" type rebuttal.

On Nec Assump, strong language usually goes beyond what the author NEEDS to assume.

On Principle-Justify, you're shopping the answer choices for a rule that helps you better conclude the conclusion. If an answer is conditional, it can only help you prove the conclusion if it has wording similar to the conclusion on the right side of the arrow (you may have to contrapose the rule to get that wording on the right side).