cwolff
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 1
Joined: February 19th, 2016
 
 
 

Faster stimulus diagramming..?

by cwolff Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:10 pm

I can diagram Parallel flaw/reasoning stimuli quickly and easily because those are just time sink questions so the arguments are typically simpler. What I'm having trouble with are the more complex NA and SA arguments. For example PT 61, Section 2, Q 24. This argument introduces terms like "decreases," "more likely" and "less likely." On my blind review I was able to create a shorthand diagram and easily found the correct answer. But I'd like to move from shorthand diagramming to simple abbreviations, however sometimes when I do this it can be hard to keep track of abbreviations' meanings.

Any suggestions?
User avatar
 
tommywallach
Thanks Received: 468
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 1041
Joined: August 11th, 2009
 
 
 

Re: Faster stimulus diagramming..?

by tommywallach Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:02 pm

Honestly, I think this is entirely up to you. Everybody has their own way of notating arguments, and there are no real best practices. Many people don't notate at all (because of the time constraints), while other people only do it when they can sense the argument is complex.

Sorry if that's not a very satisfying answer, but it's the honest one. :)

-t
Tommy Wallach
Manhattan LSAT Instructor
twallach@manhattanprep.com
Image