by ohthatpatrick Tue Jan 23, 2018 2:02 pm
Hey-hey.
They're actually not ever covered in the LR book, as far as I can find / remember.
Evaluate questions are very rare, so they don’t seem to merit their own chapter. Over the course of tests 50 - 75, there was probably only Evaluate question every four or five tests.
That said, they’ve been more common recently. It’s been about 1 per test in the last couple years. So we will definitely be including a specific mention of them in our next edition of LR books.
They’re the same reading / thinking / evaluating task as Strengthen/Weaken, but the answer choices are posed as questions.
Sometimes the correct answer is a Yes/No question, and answering it in one of those two ways would Weaken. Other times the correct answer is more open ended, and answering it a certain way would Weaken.
The correct answer should feel like a question that, if answered one way weakens and if answered the opposite way strengthens.
My approach is mainly to use a Weaken mindset:
How could I accept this evidence, but argue against the Conclusion?
As I read the questions in each answer choice, I'm just thinking, "Is there a way to answer this question that would Weaken the argument?"
Some of the correct answers on recent Evaluate questions have been pretty obnoxiously vague, meaning it would be hard to like them if you weren't already considering a (similar sounding) potential objection to the argument.
The one that comes to mind is one about "not being late for the meeting if they hadn't been doing construction out front".
Hope this helps.