inline
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 1
Joined: April 12th, 2014
 
 
 

Conditional Logic Question on MLSAT LR 'Drill It' re '

by inline Sat Apr 12, 2014 4:17 pm

3rd edition of MLSAT LR on pp 336. I am completely missing the jump between "˜if’ and "˜only if’ in the drill it section;

For example q1 asks; "˜if Janet goes to the party then Bill goes to the party’ (choose all logically equivalent answers)

(a) If Janet does not go to the party then Bill does not go.
(b) Janet goes to the party only if Bill goes.
(c) Bill goes to the party only if Janet goes
(d) If Bill does not go to the party then Janet does not go.


I totally get that "if J->B" thus answer D is clearly correct since -B -> -J

What I *do not* get is why (B) is also correct....the statement "˜if Janet goes to the party then Bill goes to the party’ did not include an ONLY IF anywhere...so I’m just missing the equivalent logic somehow.

Can someone give me a gentle SHOVE in the right direction?
User avatar
 
tommywallach
Thanks Received: 468
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 1041
Joined: August 11th, 2009
 
 
 

Re: Conditional Logic Question on MLSAT LR 'Drill It' re '

by tommywallach Wed Apr 16, 2014 8:40 pm

Hey Inline,

I will eat pizza only if you ride the bicycle.

P --> B

See why? Because the only way the pizza will happen is if the bicycle happens/happened. So if you see pizza, you know the bicycle was ridden. It's no different from:

If I eat pizza then you will ride the bicycle.

P --> B

Weird, right?

Now if it said "I will eat pizza if and only if you ride the bicycle," that would be:

P <--> B

Hope that helps!

-t
Tommy Wallach
Manhattan LSAT Instructor
twallach@manhattanprep.com
Image