Hi,
Below is a question from MGMAT critical reasoning strategy guide. My question is stated below.
"As the United States demonstrated during its early development, it is not enough for citizens that they also know how exercise those rights. Access to formal education was one necessary component that helped the U.S. citizenry to learn how to exercise its rights. Therefore, in order for a democracy to function successfully, its citizens must have access to a formal education.
The author develops the argument by
(A) using an analogy to establish a precedent for planned future event
(B) illustrating differences in the requirements for the functioning of a democracy depending upon the democracy in question
(C) introducing an example that illustrates a common principle
(D) forming a hypothesis that explains apparently contradictory pieces of evidence
(E) supplying an alternative explanation for a known phenomenon "
The correct answer choice is C. I just want to make sure that the first sentence is an example because it is a specific instance of a general rule which is the conclusion in this case. So, going forward any such sentences which are a specific instance of a general rule should be an example. Is that a correct understanding?
Thanks,..