Hello,
Below are the results of the three Manhattan CAT's that I have taken for the verbal section. Compared to the chart on the hyperlink from MBA.com, how are these results consistently putting me just short of the 50th percentile (i.e. V 27-28-29)? It appears that SC is my weakness, but they all seem to be more or less in the upper 600 band for correct and lower 700 for incorrect. Maybe my understanding of percentiles and difficulty ranges is flawed? From the website below, a 700-800 level score is at least the 88th percentile. If I use the chart's percentiles, my V score should be ~80% - due to avg correct in upper 600's - which would land me with V of 35-36-37.
https://www.mba.com/exams/gmat/after-th ... king-means
Question Format: Critical Reasoning
Average Difficulty Correct: 670
Average Difficulty Incorrect: 720
Question Format: Reading Comprehension
Average Difficulty Correct: 680
Average Difficulty Incorrect: 740
Question Format: Sentence Correction
Average Difficulty Correct: 660
Average Difficulty Incorrect: 690
I feel confident in practice questions in the OG but have generally gotten rocked in the Manhattan CAT's based on scores, so when I look at the results above I am confused on how those figures translate to a 50th percentile . I am two weeks out from the exam and am working on my time management as I have been running out of time in the Verbal CAT's. On quant, I have happily been scoring in the mid to low 40's. So, the verbal portion can make or break my chances of getting into a good school.
Given that I am a CPA and native English speaker, I am confident in my baseline intelligence to do well on this portion of the exam given the effort that I have put in. However, I am having trouble coming to terms with lower scores than those of international folks. Any assistance is appreciated. I will be taking the GMAC official practice test tomorrow to see what my official score would more closely mirror as I see that MGMAT can be very different than official GMAT.