by StaceyKoprince Mon Mar 14, 2022 6:48 pm
Ah, thank you for drawing that to my attention! That's an error.
I apologize for the error. I'm guessing that the language was mistakenly pulled from some other product line—Manhattan Prep's Qbanks are not broken down by difficulty level. I'll ask our marketing team to fix that text right away.
The reason we don't show that info, though, is because it really shouldn't impact your prep! First, the GMAT will give you a range of difficulties, so you do need to practice at all levels. Even as you lift your score, you still have to answer lower-level questions correctly to get yourself into your higher scoring range—if you don't keep practicing those, you may start making careless mistakes and preventing yourself from getting to higher levels.
Second, during the test, you never know the difficulty level of the problem on the screen—you have to decide based on the problem itself whether you can do it in a reasonable amount of time and, if so, how you want to approach it.
And finally, when you're reviewing a problem after you've tried it, what matters is whether you got it right, how much time it took, whether there's a more efficient or easier way to solve it, etc—or whether you think this problem is so hard for you or takes so long for you that you'd rather guess if you see something like it on the real test.
None of that analysis depends on the difficulty level of the problem. I've often seen people get so focused on difficulty level that they're not thinking through all of the stuff that I wrote above.
Difficulty level is useful when you're reviewing an adaptive set of questions (eg, a practice test), because the changing difficulty helps you to see what you were capable of earning as the test progressed. But in a static bank of questions, difficulty is not particularly useful.
Stacey Koprince
Instructor
Director, Content & Curriculum
ManhattanPrep