Verbal question you found somewhere else? General issue with idioms or grammar? Random verbal question? These questions belong here.
redexpo
Students
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2017 8:45 am
 

Thereby vs participle

by redexpo Sat Nov 11, 2017 12:50 am

In this post https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/medical-researchers-at-harvard-and-stanford-t30344.html, Ron writes
no. you can only use 'comma + __ing' if the __ing part is inseparable from whatever is described in the main clause.

e.g.,
Joseph was struck by a cab, dying instantly.
this sentence CORRECTLY uses 'comma __ing'.
notice that, in this context, it's impossible to separate 'joseph was struck' and 'joseph died'—in other words, it's impossible to conceive of either of them independently of the other—because they are two aspects of exactly the same event.

*Joseph was struck by a cab, dying in the hospital an hour later.
this sentence is INCORRECT, because these are two separate events.

"concluding xxxx" and "recommending yyyy" are certainly not inseparable, so 'comma __ing' can't be used here.


Given this, does "thereby" operate similarly to the correct usage of the participle described above i.e., if it refers to the same action/event? Building on Ron's example from above, can we say, "Joseph was struck by a cab, thereby dying instantly."

GMAC clearly does not think "something remains thus even when" is an awkward construction, since that appears as one of the correct answer choices somewhere in their OG. So, they expect us to have some sense of these useless lawyer words. Thanks.
Sage Pearce-Higgins
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 1336
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:04 am
 

Re: Thereby vs participle

by Sage Pearce-Higgins Tue Nov 21, 2017 11:06 am

Please feel free to add to existing threads; most likely other students will be interested by your questions too.

The word 'thereby' means 'as a result'. So the sentence you give seems totally acceptable to emphasize the connection. However, you don't really need to use 'thereby', as the comma -ing modifier already shows that it was a result.

I just took a look at that discussion of comma -ing modifiers and I would say that it's much more in depth than you need to score well on GMAT. As interesting as it is, getting too much into the minutiae of meaning and grammar probably isn't the most efficient way to study.

I don't understand your question about "something remains thus even when". Please provide the full example (search to see if it's covered in another thread first).