angad.patel Wrote:Can you please explain when one should add the individual probabilities of events versus multiplying them?
i.e. how is one supposed to determine whether -
15/45 + 14/44
vs.
15/45 x 14/44
Aren't only independent events supposed to be multiplied? In this case the second event depends on the first (probability a slate rock will be picked and not replaced, etc.)?
yes, but, technically, when you do this sort of "without replacement" thing -- i.e., reducing the value of the denominator according to the items that have already been selected -- you have satisfied the criteria for independence.
in general, however, you can trust that the gmat will not test you on "independent vs. non-independent events", so it won't be productive for you to fuss over that particular definition. instead, just make sure that you know that in cases like this -- in which you have the probabilities of CONSECUTIVE events -- you should just multiply the probabilities.
adding the probabilities is reserved for situations in which the events are mutually exclusive (i.e., there is no overlap between the events), and you wish to find the probability of EITHER of the two situations.
for instance, if the probability of drawing a black sock from a drawer full of socks is 2/5, and the probability of drawing a white sock from that drawer is 1/5, then the probability of drawing a sock that is either white OR black is 3/5.
in this case, it should be clear that you wouldn't want to add the probabilities.
the probability that just the first rock is slate is 15/45, so the probability that BOTH of the first two rocks are slate must be SMALLER than this figure. if you add a probability to this, you'll get a larger probability, which wouldn't make sense.