Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes

[michail.palagaschwili]

Hi guys, I encountered this question on the free GMATprep. I could narrow down to B and D, but picked D in the last moment.

Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at which they lose money, in order to drive competitors off those routes. However, this method of eliminating competition cannot be profitable in the long run. Once an airline sucessfully implements this method, any attempt to recoup the earlier losses by charging high fares on that route for an extended period would only provide competitors with a better opportunity to undercut the airline's fares.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A) In some countries it is not illegal for a company to drive away competitors by selling a product below cost.

B) Airline executives generally believe that a company that once underpriced its fares to drive away competitors is very likely to do so again if new competitors emerge.

C) As part of promotions designed to attract new customers, airlines sometimes reduce their ticket prices to below an economically sustainable level.

D) On deciding to stop serving particular routes, most airlines shift resources to other routes rather than reduce the size of their operations.

E) When airlines dramatically reduce their fares on a particular route, the total number of air passengers on that route increases greatly.

The OA is B

My reasoning for answer choice D:

Some airline reduces its fair below the profit margin, as a result all the competitors leave that particular route completely, so when this airline raises its fair back to profitable level, there is no one to compete and it will certainly generate profit.

So why not D ?

[RonPurewal]

please search the forum. thank you.
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/foru ... t1832.html

[RonPurewal]

if you have further questions after reading through that thread in its entirety, please post them on that thread. thanks.