Very difficult only if you watch at this from the wrong way. I approached as simple minded way.. sometimes it is the quickiest way to find a solution and so, for paced Exams, also one of the right solution. Start with brute force and always put an eye on the answers: 1step) we have 4 ranges to analy...

Hi, - Target at Tense Agreement: The subject is SW so eliminate plural person "have". That leaves A.C.E. .. Ace them! - Target at Idiom: Not Only .x. But Also .y. is the correct: Eliminate D and E. - Target at Pronoun/ Parallel /Wordy: Not Only verb without explicit sbj but also require ve...

It is uninfluent if we have 2 or more digit numbers in the evaluation of the tenth digit.
86+4=90 => digit number is 9 not 4
if we suppose the number to be 136+4= 140 the things go ahead the same way than in the case of 1 digit number.

Have I fallen a wire of your thoughts?

think it easy: 1) x-y=1/2 .. Positive => x>y since can be: (+,+) or (+,-) or (-,-) : Insuff 2) x/y>1 since x/y>0 since (x,y) have to have the same sign: (-,-) or (+,+) : Insuff Let's see what we could earn putting together: 2) finding the conditions of existence of the second expression ...

Hi all.

the simplified denominator is 30 hence n have to be multiple of 30 : this involve that the prime factor are at least 2,3,5 . The next prime could be 7 but 30*7 is 210>200 so the only prime admitted by the question is the triplet 2,3,5 so Three is the right answer.

# The complex tax dispute between the Covered Bridge Mall and Harris Township is not likely to be adjudicated for several years, and, in the meantime, both sides are intent on creating difficulties for the other. A.both sides are intent on creating difficulties for the other B.both sides are intent...

Hi AndreaDB, could you please elaborate on "case is inverse acting"? thank you. I meant F go against G and G go against F. when you use Both I mean that together do someting: A means: F and G together work against H , mentioned as "the other" and implied by the form of the sente...

Not sure if the Answer is C. C falls apart when we take x=5 => |5-2| - |5-3| != |5-5| The answer is A and I have a very convoluted way of solving the problem. set-1: |x-2| => x > -2 and x > 2 => x belongs to (-infinity, -2) or (2, infinity) set-2: |x-3| => x belongs to (-infinity,...

Hi All, In my opinion, the correct idiom "Not only....But also" however in this sentence, be careful with the "Verb Tense", to be exact" Will", rewrite this sentence : The S/W "will" not only meet....(will) but also have. Thanks, Correct reasoning. it is a ca...

My approach as following : 1. x - y = 1/2 => x = y + 1/2. Y can be either positive or negative, therefore X can be + or - number. --- Not sufficient 2. x/y > 1 implies that X and Y has to be of same sign, either both positive or both negative. -- not sufficient Combining (1) and (2), infact s...