tgt.ivyleague Wrote:Hi there .....
Is OA indeed d ???
yes.
The gypsy moth was imported into Massachusetts from Europe in 1869 by a French scientist attempting to develop a strong strain of silk-producing insects by crossing gypsy moths with adult silkworms.
Isnt this altered intent as per SC guide ??
Did the Frence scientist import the moth ??? Or did he just use it for his expt ??
perhaps the meaning is changed a little bit, but this doesn't matter -- the other four choices are all grammatically incorrect.
remember, [b]you should not worry about differences in meaning, unless there are two or more choices that are grammatically correct.
if there are four grammatically incorrect answers and only one grammatically sound answer, then it actually doesn't matter what is in the grammatically sound answer -- it's the only one that is correct!
Also it appears as if the Scientist was importing the moth into Massachusetts from Europe in 1869 by crossing gypsy moths with adult silkworms which is nonsensical !![/b]
nope -- that modifier ("by crossing...") applies to the closest action, which is "to develop a strong strain of silk-producing insects..."
this is usually (though not always) how these essential modifiers work: if there is a conflict between two or more actions that they can modify, they normally modify the closest action. generally, if the context is obvious enough, these modifiers are ok.
Moreover, i find the sentence to be a very long single one without any commas in between ... making it very complex and wordy.
well, sure, but there are plenty of official answers that are written like that.
it's actually not "wordy"; "wordy" means that there is an unnecessarily large number of words. that's not the case here (do you think you can get rid of some words in the correct answer? if so, which ones?)
...and almost ALL of the correct answers in sentence correction are "complex", especially if you are scoring above a certain level on the verbal section.
I would rather go with option A ... can't "attemt at" be used at all ????
Some help here please!
the biggest problem with choice (a) is actually not an idiom issue -- it's the gross misuse of the COMMA + -ING modifier.
see:
the gypsy moth was used by a French scientist in an attempt at developing a strong strain of silk-producing insects, crossing gypsy moths with... when you use COMMA -ING modifiers:
* they modify the action of the preceding clause, and
* the SUBJECT of the preceding clause should be the agent of the -ING action
the second of these rules, if applied to choice (a), tells us that the gypsy moth itself (the subject of the preceding clause) is the one who is "crossing gypsy moths...". that is most certainly not true, so choice (a) is ungrammatical.