If you're experiencing a roadblock with one of the Manhattan Prep GMAT math strategy guides, help is here!
casey.chopek
Course Students
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 12:40 pm
 

Question on VICs

by casey.chopek Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:23 pm

Hey Guys,

In the Eq, Ineq, VICs book, I am working through the chapter on VICs. In the 'Algebraic VIC Example' Section on p. 118 it simplifies the term to this point:

ab-2=144/cd - 2

I understand this. However, the next step is:

ab-2=(144/cd)-(2cd/cd) then ab-2=(144-2cd)/cd

I can't seem to recall the algebraic rule that supports these two steps. Can someone refresh my memory?

I'd greatly appreciate it!

Thanks!
casey.chopek
Course Students
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 12:40 pm
 

Re: Question on VICs

by casey.chopek Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:24 am

Nevermind. Today I get this. Must've been the late hour on Sunday! Math is hard at night! :)
esledge
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 1181
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 6:33 am
Location: St. Louis, MO
 

Re: Question on VICs

by esledge Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:07 pm

No kidding! Sleep deprivation and math ability are inversely correlated, I think.

But for the benefit of anyone else reading this...
casey.chopek Wrote:ab-2=(144/cd)-(2cd/cd) then ab-2=(144-2cd)/cd

I can't seem to recall the algebraic rule that supports these two steps. Can someone refresh my memory?

...the rule is that when adding or subtracting fractions, and the denominator is the same, you just add or subtract the respective numerators.
Emily Sledge
Instructor
ManhattanGMAT