I finished the GMAT for the first time a couple weeks back and scored a 710 overall (V - 42/96%, Q - 44/61%). My ultimate goal is to be a contender for a few of the top tier business schools - Wharton and Columbia are two in particular that I am interested in. I really burnt myself out studying for the test and the idea of having to gear back up for round two isn't all that appealing. I took all 6 MGMAT CAT's and the highest % I got on Quant was 68%, with the rest ranging from the high 50's to low 60's, so while I think I could improve from 61%, my guess is that my score may drop in verbal and my overall score would be around or below a 710. On the flip side, I was an Econ major at UVA, graduated with a 3.5, took upwards of 10 Econ/stat/math related courses and another 5-10 finance and real estate valuation courses. Further, I have spent 3 years as a financial analyst and associate at a reputable commercial real estate advisory firm and will have another 2 years as a financial analyst on the buy side, so my "numbers" exposure is deep in academia and real world experience.
I've heard that Wharton used to have a quasi-firm 80% quant rule which may not still be the case but that they stress strong quant abilities. Will this low %tile, what would be my chances of acceptance assuming all else equal and the quals above? Should I try re-taking to better position myself for a school like Wharton or would you suggest moving on to formulating my story? If I re-took and scored lower, would the fact that admissions folks could see it in the system affect their perception of my abilities, despite them "taking" the highest score?
Thanks,
Chase