I just took the GMAT yesterday for the second time (first time was a 610) and am somewhat dissappointed by my score considering I was testing in upper 600 lower 700 range in practice. My quant was pretty low falling in the 65 percentile which I am not too happy about (overall of 79 percentile combining verbal).
Details about myself:
Age: 26
Male
Ethnicity: Filipino/Lebanese
Industry: Banking
Work Exp: 4-5 yrs
I graduated from a state school in Florida, 3.6 GPA, Cum Laude, involved in many extracurriculars. Over my past 4 years of working, I've managed to climb up from the commercial banking sector to make my way into investment banking, an accomplishment in itself, considering a majority of schools down in FL are non-target schools for IB. I remain involved in a lot of community service in the city I work in, and try to get involved in activities outside my daily job.
With the score I've received, I've adjusted my target schools, and I'd like to get an opinion on if these are still plausible choices for full-time MBA. I'm looking to get a focus on entrepreneurship and potentially work for a startup post MBA.
1) UCLA
2) Texas
3) USC
4) IE Business School
5) NYU
I plan on going second round for most of these. Do you think it is worth it for me to take the GMAT for a third time (I'd need to take probably by early November) to try to hit higher in the 600s, or at this point should I just start focusing on my essays/rec letters to try to put together a complete package that addresses the weaker GMAT? Will it really be a big factor to get those extra points?
I appreciate any feedback.
Thanks,