Probably printing miss in the online syllabus!

[AsadA969]

Hi Stacey,
In Manhattan GMAT's online class syllabus, the verbal-6 (after session 6) indicates the task #D37 (page# 40, OG-2017 edition), but there is NO diagnostic 37 (D37) in this page. This page carries Diagnostic# 85,86,87,88,89. So, which one will be the specific task for this session?
Thank you Stacey...

[StaceyKoprince]

Whoops! Thanks for this catch. That numbering is for OG2016. The correct number is D85.

We'll get this fixed!

[AsadA969]

Whoops! Thanks for this catch. That numbering is for OG2016. The correct number is D85.

We'll get this fixed!

So many thanks Stacey!

[StaceyKoprince]

Thank you!!

[AsadA969]

Hi Stacey,
There is a little bit mistake in one of the Navigator's specific problem of Official Guide 2017 edition.
Problem solving question# 221,
the correct equation should be:
P (Zelda does NOT solves the problem)=1-P(Zelda solves the problem)
--> P (Zelda does NOT solves the problem)=1-(5/8)

But, it has been written mistakenly the following:
P (Zelda does NOT solve the problem)=1-P(Zelda does NOT solve the problem).
I think it should be corrected if I'm not wrong!

also, in OG 2017 edition, PS#200, page#179
Quoted the line from Navigator (last line of the solution)
""Note that if we have mistakenly thought 143 was a prime, we should have identified only two unique primes between 1 and 100?''''
My Question: Should not it be three primes between 1 and 100?
Thank you Stacey...

[StaceyKoprince]

#221: Yes, you are right—that is a typo! I will submit this for a fix. Thank you!

And for #200: Yes, I agree. If someone thought 143 was prime, then they'd find 2, 5, and 143—3 primes.

Thanks again!