I agree with Omkar that we need to know your goal score in order to best advise you. For example, if you want a 700, then you probably need more time than 1 month. If you are going for a 650, then 1 month might be enough time if we can fix your timing problems and also make progress in other areas.
Use the below article to analyze your most recent MGMAT test. That will give us a good picture of your strengths and weaknesses so that we can devise a plan.
http://www.manhattangmat.com/blog/index ... ice-tests/Note: when you come back here, don't just share the raw data - tell us what you think it means and what you think you should do about it. The ability to self-assess, make plans, and adjust plans is critically important.
Re: the timing issues, read this:
http://www.manhattangmat.com/blog/index ... to-win-it/And then this:
http://www.manhattangmat.com/blog/index ... anagement/It typically takes people 4 to 6 weeks (possibly longer) to fix timing issues - it's rarely a quick fix. The good news is that your timing issues could explain why you're not seeing the progress that you feel like you should be seeing. You can objectively get better by 100 points and yet see nothing happen to your score if your timing issues are significant enough.
You mentioned that you often aren't sure what to do with new problems. Take a look at this article; are you thinking about these things when studying a problem? (Note: studying a problem is what you do after you try it in the first place. Studying typically takes 2 to 5 times as long as trying the problem in the first place - and you don't only study things when you get the problem wrong or don't understand something.)
http://www.manhattangmat.com/articles/a ... roblem.cfmWhen you're studying, you're learning how to think your way through a new problem. When you then try a new problem, you're simply testing yourself to see whether you've learned how to think (and whether you know whatever material is being tested on that problem, of course) - and, if not, then you go try to learn more about how to think / analyze. BIG emphasis on learning how to think your way through something - this is NOT like tests in school, where you just had to memorize stuff and spit it back on questions that very closely / obviously resembled what you studied.
For example, if I showed you an old problem you'd already done and said, "Tell me
how you know what to do - not actually what to do but how you know that that's the best way to do this problem" - could you do that? And can you do that based only on the problem text in front of you and any connections you can make to similar problems you've done in the past? (That is, your answer to my question shouldn't involve anything that you only knew because you read the explanation or already knew what the answer was.)
My guess is that you've been doing the same thing that a lot of people do - trying to do tons and tons of questions but not really learning how to think your way through or do the things described in the "how to analyze" article linked above. If that's the case, then what you're looking at is learning a new way to study. (And this may also be why you feel you aren't making enough progress for the amount of study you've already put in.)
What do you think about all of that?