1. When it rains, my car gets wet. Since it hasn't rained recently, my car can't be wet
Which of the following is logically most similar to the argument above?
A)Whenever critics give a play a favourable review, people go to see it; Pinter's new play did not receive favourable reviews, so I doubt that anyone will go to see it.
B)Whenever people go to see a play, critics give it a favourable review; people did go to see Pinter's new play, so it did get a favourable review.
C)Whenever critics give a play a favourable review, people go to see it; Pinter's new play got favourable reviews, so people will probably go to see it.
D)Whenever a play is given favourable reviews by the critics, people go to see it; since people are going to see Pinter's new play, it will probably get favourable reviews.
E)Whenever critics give a play a favourable review, people go to see it; people are not going to see Pinter's new play, so it did not get favourable reviews.
B. Whenever people go to see a play (When it rains), critics give it a favourable review(my car gets wet); (since)people did go to see Pinter's new play (Since it hasn't rained recently), so it did get a favourable review ((so) my car can't be wet
)
How to eliminate B...Oa is A
A)Whenever critics give a play a favourable review (When it rains), , people go to see it (my car gets wet); Pinter's new play did not receive favourable reviews (Since it hasn't rained recently), so I doubt that anyone will go to see it ((so) my car can't be wet)
Firstly, "I doubt" is not same as " My car can't be" as "doubt" shows a degree of possibility and "can" shows certainity.
Secondly, are we suppose to use our commonsense and think that review of critics should always precede going of audience to watch the movie...Usually we do not assume such things unless stated in the stimulus...Is this the only reason why B is ruled out (provided this is a reason, if at all)...