Questions about the world of GMAT Math from other sources and general math related questions.
MaandaR139
Course Students
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2014 8:34 pm
 

Number of Factors vs Number of Distinct Factors

by MaandaR139 Tue Apr 28, 2015 9:23 am

I came across something I have found confusing regarding counting the number of factors.

I seen a question asking for the 'number of factors' of a square. One of the answers gives the factors for 36 as (1, 36) (2, 18) (3,12) (4, 9) (6, 6). It then counts them as 9.

My question is when counting factors should I ignore duplicates? Is there ever a situation where I should include the duplicated factors?

Thank you in advance.

Regards
Maanda
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Number of Factors vs Number of Distinct Factors

by RonPurewal Wed May 06, 2015 7:11 pm

this will not be an issue, because GMAC will take pains to ensure that problem statements are completely unambiguous.

• for cases in which you should NOT count duplicates (= the vast majority of cases), GMAC will include the word DIFFERENT in front of "factors".
(there's also "distinct", which means exactly the same thing, but i don't think i've seen that word in a GMAC problem.)

• if you do, in fact, encounter a case in which you should count duplicate factors, the problem statement will make this point perfectly, exactingly clear, and will probably even provide an example just to drive the point home.
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Number of Factors vs Number of Distinct Factors

by RonPurewal Wed May 06, 2015 7:12 pm

RonPurewal Wrote:• if you do, in fact, encounter a case in which you should count duplicate factors, the problem statement will make this point perfectly, exactingly clear, and will probably even provide an example just to drive the point home.


here's an example of this ^^ :

https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/foru ... -t630.html

notice that, on top of the definition/problem statement, there's an example-- an example that, non-coincidentally, answers exactly the question you have in mind here.