The Ergonomic Society conducted a study that indicated that many people develop severe back problems during adulthood, and that virtually all such people who received chiropractic treatment showed great improvement. Therefore, in order to minimize the proportion of the population that suffers from back pain, the Ergonomic Society recommended that chiropractic treatment be directed toward those adults who suffer from severe back problems.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
a) Any person who receives chiropractic treatment for back pain may also benefit from other forms of treatment.
b) Large insurance carriers cover chiropractic care for back problems to a lesser degree than they do other medical treatments.
c) Individuals who receive chiropractic or other treatment prior to developing severe back problems are not less likely to develop back pain than those who do not.
d) Chiropractic treatment is more effective in treating severe back problems when utilized over a long period of time, as opposed to sporadically.
e) Severe back pain and other problems often cause individuals to miss workdays.
OA: C
Got it correct by eliminating other four choices, but couldn't make sense of the OA until I made a small modification in my understanding of the stem "…Therefore, in order to minimize the proportion of the population that suffers from back pain, the Ergonomic Society recommended that chiropractic treatment be directed toward ONLY those adults who suffer from severe back problems…" At this point the OA fitted perfectly well.
Perhaps I am totally wrong, but addition of "ONLY" made a huge difference in my reasoning. I felt the absence of "ONLY" subtly obfuscated my line of thought.
A) Should I expect GMAT CR to indulge in such "subtle obfuscation"? Is this very much part of the game?
B) Is resorting to POE without worrying much about "closing the reasoning loop", at least for questions that seem very baffling, a legit tool?
BTW, it's just a query; I don't intend to question/ridicule the particular CR problem :)
Many thanks.