by Sage Pearce-Higgins Tue Nov 13, 2018 12:20 pm
I would say no. This kind of modifier is a bit like the 'comma VERB-ing' modifier in that it modifies the whole clause. Also, we'd expect a comma before 'located'. The general principle here is that we need some connection between the events. Take this (correct) example:
The dog fell asleep, exhausted from the run.
This is fine, since we've got a clear relationship between being exhausted and falling asleep. However, this example is not fine:
The dog fell asleep, raised by my brother.
Since there's no obvious connection between the two facts, we'd be better off using the 'which' modifier:
The dog, which was raised by my brother, fell asleep.