Verbal problems from the *free* official practice tests and
problems from mba.com
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Just like the background in art history . . .

by RonPurewal Sun Jun 21, 2015 5:42 pm

People who live in Texas.

do you understand why that ^^ is not a complete sentence?
if so, then you also understand the answer to your question.
SohamM699
Students
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 7:34 am
 

Re: Just like the background in art history . . .

by SohamM699 Sun Aug 02, 2015 4:57 pm

Hi. I have a relatively generic doubt that has come up after reading this discussion.
So, the sentence
1. "Just as an archaeologist needs a background in art history to evaluate finds of ancient art, so a nautical archaeologist needs specialized knowledge of the history" is correct.

Similarly, the version without so and without who would be correct,
2. "Just as an archaeologist needs a background in art history to evaluate finds of ancient art, a nautical archaeologist needs specialized knowledge of the history"

Would a third version where instead of Just as X, Y, Like X, Y would be correct (with X and Y being independent clauses)?

3. "Like an archaeologist needs a background in art history to evaluate finds of ancient art, a nautical archaeologist needs specialized knowledge of the history"

Is version 3 correct?
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Just like the background in art history . . .

by RonPurewal Wed Aug 05, 2015 6:00 am

no. you can't have 'Like + [entire sentence]'.

it has to be 'Like NOUN #1, NOUN #2 does xxxx.'
ZoeZ42
Students
 
Posts: 43
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2016 4:05 am
 

Re: Just like the background in art history . . .

by ZoeZ42 Sun Jan 08, 2017 2:09 am

HI MANHATTAN tutors,
I am not question the correct GMAT questions, I completely understand GMAT quesions are always correct if they are correct.
I am just want to make it clear that when second sentence Y sould be inverted if the structure is "just as X , so Y "
I have some sentence from MANHATTAN sentence correcting guide. 6th Edition
P183,
Right: JUST AS the trains were late yesterday, the buses are late today.
Right: JUST AS the trains were late yesterday, SO TOO are they late today.--inverted

P221
AS you practice, SO shall you play. (= in the same way or manner) -- inverted
JUST AS you practice, SO shall you play. (= in the same way or manner) --inverted
JUST AS you practice piano regularly, you should study regularly. (= in the same way; the situations are analogous)

please clarify when the second part should be invertedl.

thanks in advance

have a nice day
>_~
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Just like the background in art history . . .

by RonPurewal Mon Jan 09, 2017 4:55 am

^^ this is not a decision you will ever have to make.

all you need to understand is that the inverted order is possible. you'll never have to decide between the "normal" and "inverted" orders.
JbhB682
Course Students
 
Posts: 520
Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 2:13 pm
 

Re: Just like the background in art history . . .

by JbhB682 Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:35 am

Hi - A quick question on the following right choices below

P183 (SC Strategy Guide, edition 6)

Right: JUST AS the trains were late yesterday, the buses are late today.
Right: JUST AS the trains were late yesterday, SO TOO are they late today.--

Question :

why is "are" used .... the "are" indicates the present tense.

To keep will parallelism, should "Are" not be "Were" instead as the reds are in the past ....so the other verb too has to be in the past tense ( per parallelism rules both tenses have to be in sync)
Sage Pearce-Higgins
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 1336
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:04 am
 

Re: Just like the background in art history . . .

by Sage Pearce-Higgins Mon Jul 03, 2017 2:32 am

The verb "are" is used because it's talking about buses and trains today, in the present time! It looks like you're getting too concerned about rules, and are ignoring the meaning of the sentences.

It's important to note that parallelism doesn't have to include verb tense. Take the example: "Tim likes bananas now, but didn't like them when he was a child." It's totally fine, even though it has verbs in different tenses.