Math problems from the *free* official practice tests and
problems from mba.com
mschwrtz
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:03 pm
 

Re: Is XY>0?

by mschwrtz Mon Nov 01, 2010 1:42 am

Ah, makes sense then.
ifydaniel100
Students
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
 

Re: Is XY>0?

by ifydaniel100 Tue Mar 12, 2013 1:56 pm

Ron, I'm struggling to understand how the second statement proves that x is definitely positive. I follow that y>4 and I follow that x>2 if I only test equation (1). But I would think that I should be able to test either and come away with the fact that x is positive. However when I test equation (2) x proves to be positive or negative!

Testing equation (2) x - 2y < -6

since y>4
If y = 4.1, then x - 8.2 < -6 and x < 2.2 (this suggests x can be positive or negative)
If y = 6, then x - 12 < -6 and x < 6 (this suggests x can be positive or negative)
and so on...

I don't understand how we prove x is definitely positive if I test equation (2)
tim
Course Students
 
Posts: 5665
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:08 am
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
 

Re: Is XY>0?

by tim Wed Mar 13, 2013 2:25 am

as near as i can tell, several people have mentioned that the answer is C in this thread. when a data sufficiency answer is C, that means statement 2 will NOT give you a definitive answer. so your claim that x can be positive or negative is entirely consistent with the stated answer to the problem..
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Follow this link for some important tips to get the most out of your forum experience:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/a-few-tips-t31405.html
ifydaniel100
Students
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
 

Re: Is XY>0?

by ifydaniel100 Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:55 pm

Thanks Tim. Just to make sure i'm on the same page, you are saying that when evaluating option C, we have our answer after evaluating only statement (1) because we are simply trying to prove the sign of x. Had we tested statement (2) first we would have determined that x could be either positive or negative and at that point would have had to evaluate statement (1) to find the x values that overlap with statement (2). In other words - Statement 1, x is positive. Statement (2), x is positive or negative. Overlap, x is positive.
jlucero
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 1102
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 1:33 am
 

Re: Is XY>0?

by jlucero Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:41 pm

Here's what's tricky about having multiple inequalities and trying to plug in values. When you solve for the first variable, you are finding all cases that COULD work for that variable. But when you plug in the lower extreme (y=4) into each equation, you aren't guaranteed that any numbers will work with that particular variable. But remember that y>4, so let's say that y = 10. By plugging in values of y = 10, you learn from (1) that x > 8, and from (2) that x < 14. These two equations combine to give you a range for what x has to be if y is some particular value. That's why when you plugged in y = 2, you got a confusing answer- x can't be both greater and less than 2.

The key thing though, is once you discover that y > 4, the first equation (x + 2 > y) tells us that no matter how much smaller or larger y is than 4, x will have to be an even larger number. That guarantees that the product is positive.

Graphically, we can see this from the picture I took of a graphing calculator. Note that the only place where there is overlap in these two inequalities is in quadrant one, when both x and y are positive.
Attachments
graph.png
graph.png (79.98 KiB) Viewed 1177 times
Joe Lucero
Manhattan GMAT Instructor