by Ben Ku Thu Oct 29, 2009 12:43 am
We are left with the rephrased question, Is x^y = y^x? winsayou said the only way this would work is if x = y. There are actually a few other possibilities: (2, 4), (4, 2), (-2, -4) and (-4, -2).
So we need to ask: Does x = y or (2, 4) or (4, 2) or (-2, -4) or (-4, -2).
Statement (1) states x^x > y. This statement on its own does not result in any of our four numerical solutions.
We have to ask, if x^x > y, do we know if x = y? Let's test some values:
If x = 3 and y = 3, so 9 > 3, then the answer is YES.
If x = 3 and y = 1, so 9 > 1, then the answer is NO.
Because this statement yields mixed answers, statement (1) is insufficient.
Statement (2) states x > y^y. This statement on its own does not result in any of our four numerical solution.
We have to ask, if x > y^y, do we know if x = y? Let's test some values:
If x = 9 and y = 3, then the answer is NO.
So are there ANY situations where x = y? Suppose x = y, can x > x^x? This can NEVER be the case because the number will not be larger than a power of the number. Therefore, statement (2) is sufficient, because x will NEVER be y.
The answer is B.
winsayou's response is close. A few cautions:
(1) winsayou found that the question can be ask if x = y. However, the numerical solutions of 2^4 = 4^2 and (-2)^(-4) = (-4)^(-2) was not thought of.
(2) for the statements, winsayou ASSUMED that "if x = y" to evaluate the statements. This is the wrong process; you should not assume the question to evaluate the statement. Instead, you need to use do it the other way around: use the statements to evaluate the question.
Hope that helps.
Ben Ku
Instructor
ManhattanGMAT