Jellie Wrote:If a + b= 200 and a < b, is a + b > c + d?
(1) c + d < 200
(2) b + c + d = 300
it doesn't seem that statement 1 is causing any major consternation here, so let's skip to statement 2.
note that the expression c + d appears in the question prompt. therefore, solve for this expression in statement 2: c + d = 300 - b.
now, substitute this into the question prompt, and also substitute a + b = 200:
is 200 > 300 - b ?
rephrase by solving -->
is b > 100?
thus, it still comes down to divya's observation that b must be more than 100, because it's the larger one of two numbers that add to 200 and therefore must be greater than half of 200.
but if you rephrase the question in this way, it's much more clear that you actually have to
think about whether b > 100.
divya's solution is ingenious, but remember that ingenious is what we
don't want; we want reliable and easily generalized. therefore, while i wouldn't expect you to come up with divya's awesome observation completely at random, i
would expect you to come up with the following TAKEAWAY:
takeaway: if 2 numbers add up to n, then the larger number is more than n/2, and the smaller number is less than n/2.
good stuff